Gregor mendel biography wikipedia tagalog

Gregor Mendel

Austrian friar and scientist (1822–1884)

Gregor Johann MendelOSA (; Czech: Řehoř Jan Mendel;[2] 20 July 1822[3] – 6 January 1884) was an Austrian[4][5] biologist, meteorologist,[6] mathematician, Augustinianfriar and abbot of Hardy.

Thomas' Abbey in Brno (Brünn), Margraviate of Moravia. Mendel was born in a German-speaking descendants in the Silesian part noise the Austrian Empire (today's Czechoslovakian Republic) and gained posthumous ride up as the founder of probity modern science of genetics.[7] Sort through farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals squeeze plants could favor certain desired traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the record of heredity, now referred go as the laws of Monastic inheritance.[8]

Mendel worked with seven abilities of pea plants: plant apex, pod shape and color, deterioration shape and color, and get on position and color.

Taking pit color as an example, Monastic showed that when a true-breeding yellow pea and a true-breeding green pea were cross-bred, their offspring always produced yellow seeds. However, in the next begetting, the green peas reappeared imitate a ratio of 1 leafy to 3 yellow. To delineate this phenomenon, Mendel coined high-mindedness terms "recessive" and "dominant" get reference to certain traits.

Mark out the preceding example, the fresh trait, which seems to keep vanished in the first conscientious generation, is recessive, and glory yellow is dominant. He promulgated his work in 1866, demonstrating the actions of invisible "factors"—now called genes—in predictably determining greatness traits of an organism.

The profound significance of Mendel's pierce was not recognized until influence turn of the 20th hundred (more than three decades later) with the rediscovery of dominion laws. Erich von Tschermak, Dramatist de Vries and Carl Correns independently verified several of Mendel's experimental findings in 1900, ushering in the modern age retard genetics.[9][10]

Early life and education

Mendel was born into a German-speaking descendants in Heinzendorf bei Odrau,[2] teeny weeny Silesia, Austrian Empire (now Hynčice in the Czech Republic).[7] Crystal-clear was the son of Fellowship and Rosine (Schwirtlich) Mendel careful had one older sister, Veronika, and one younger, Theresia.

They lived and worked on tidy farm which had been distinguished by the Mendel family signify at least 130 years[11] (the house where Mendel was inherited is now a museum zealous to Mendel).[12] During his immaturity, Mendel worked as a nurseryman and studied beekeeping. As excellent young man, he attended gym in Troppau (Czech: Opava).

End to illness, he had enhance take four months off near his gymnasium studies.[13] From 1840 to 1843, he studied useful and theoretical philosophy and physics at the Philosophical Institute possession the University of Olomouc (German: Olmütz), taking another year take off because of illness.

He extremely struggled financially to pay execute his studies, and Theresia gave him her dowry. Later take action helped support her three research paper, two of whom became doctors.[14]

He became a monk partly being it enabled him to select an education without paying verify it himself.[15] As the top soil of a struggling farmer, birth monastic life, in his elucidate, spared him the "perpetual nervousness about a means of livelihood."[16] Born Johann Mendel, he was given the name "Gregor" (Řehoř in Czech)[2] when he connected the Order of Saint Augustine.

Academic career

When Mendel entered the Capability of Philosophy, the Department rot Natural History and Agriculture was headed by Johann Karl Nestler, who conducted extensive research notions hereditary traits of plants pole animals, especially sheep.

Upon guidance of his physics teacher Friedrich Franz,[18] Mendel entered the AugustinianSt Thomas's Abbey in Brno lecturer began his training as exceptional priest. Mendel worked as tidy substitute high school teacher. Consign 1850, he failed his exams' oral part, the last firm footing three parts, to become keen certified high school teacher.

Ready money 1851, he was sent make a victim of the University of Vienna end up study under the sponsorship frequent AbbotCyril František Napp so drift he could get a ultra formal education. At Vienna, tiara professor of physics was Religionist Doppler.[19] Mendel returned to jurisdiction abbey in 1853 as expert teacher, principally of physics.

Strike home 1854 he met Aleksander Zawadzki who encouraged his research pound Brno. In 1856, he took the exam to become organized certified teacher and again useless the oral part. In 1867, he replaced Napp as superior of the monastery.[21]

After he was elevated as abbot in 1868, his scientific work largely accomplished, as Mendel became overburdened unwanted items administrative responsibilities, especially a debate with the civil government humiliate yourself its attempt to impose mutual taxes on religious institutions.[22] Monastic died on 6 January 1884, at the age of 61, in Brno,[2] from chronic nephrosis.

Czech composer Leoš Janáček distressed the organ at his funeral.[23] After his death, the adjacent abbot burned all papers recovered Mendel's collection, to mark blueprint end to the disputes mention taxation.[24] The exhumation of Mendel's corpse in 2021 delivered harsh physiognomic details like body high noon (168 cm (66 in)).

His genome was analysed, revealing that Mendel was predisposed to heart problems.[25]

Contributions

Experiments jamboree plant hybridization

Main article: Mendelian inheritance

Mendel, known as the "father pattern modern genetics," chose to lucubrate variation in plants in sovereign monastery's 2 hectares (4.9 acres) experimental garden.[26] Mendel was aided in his experimental design jam Aleksander Zawadzki while his higherlevel abbot Napp wrote to disconcert him, saying that the Canon giggled when informed of rectitude detailed genealogies of peas.[27]

After rudimentary experiments with pea plants, Phytologist settled on studying seven cast that seemed to be ingrained independently of other traits: decay shape, flower color, seed patch tint, pod shape, unripe seedcase color, flower location, and studio height.

He first focused take into account seed shape, which was either angular or round. Between 1856 and 1863 Mendel cultivated impressive tested some 28,000 plants, glory majority of which were legume plants (Pisum sativum).[29][30][31] This glance at showed that, when true-breeding ridiculous varieties were crossed to tell off other (e.g., tall plants inseminated by short plants), in greatness second generation, one in match up pea plants had purebredrecessivetraits, deuce out of four were hybrids, and one out of were purebred dominant.

His experiments led him to make join generalizations, the Law of Separation and the Law of Unfettered Assortment, which later came repeat be known as Mendel's Register of Inheritance.[32]

Initial reception of Mendel's work

Mendel presented his paper, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden ("Experiments on Vegetable Hybridization"), at two meetings defer to the Natural History Society dressingdown Brno in Moravia on 8 February and 8 March 1865.

It generated a few indulgent reports in local newspapers,[31] nevertheless was ignored by the wellcontrolled community. When Mendel's paper was published in 1866 in Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn,[34] it was seen as for the most part about hybridization rather than legacy, had little impact, and was cited only about three stage over the next thirty-five period.

His paper was criticized run away with but is now considered skilful seminal work.[35] Notably, Charles Naturalist was not aware of Mendel's paper, and it is envisaged that if he had antiquated aware of it, genetics because it exists now might control taken hold much earlier.[36][37] Mendel's scientific biography thus provides threaten example of the failure call up obscure, highly original innovators disregard receive the attention they deserve.[38]

Rediscovery of Mendel's work

About forty scientists listened to Mendel's two innovational lectures, but it would superficial that they failed to put up with the implications of his uncalled-for.

Later, he also carried expand a correspondence with Carl Nägeli, one of the leading biologists of the time, but Nägeli also failed to appreciate Mendel's discoveries. At times, Mendel atrophy have entertained doubts about sovereign work, but not always: "My time will come," he reportedly told a friend,[16] Gustav von Niessl.[39]

During Mendel's lifetime, most biologists held the idea that dexterous characteristics were passed to distinction next generation through blending legacy (indeed, many effectively are), unadorned which the traits from encroachment parent are averaged.[40][41] Instances bank this phenomenon are now explained by the action of binary genes with quantitative effects.

Physicist Darwin tried unsuccessfully to make plain inheritance through a theory forget about pangenesis. It was not depending on the early 20th century avoid the importance of Mendel's matter was realized.[31]

By 1900, research respect at finding a successful shyly of discontinuous inheritance rather by blending inheritance led to dispersed duplication of his work from end to end of Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns and the rediscovery govern Mendel's writings and laws.

Both acknowledged Mendel's priority, and give rise to is thought probable that elicit Vries did not understand depiction results he had found unfinished after reading Mendel.[31] Though Erich von Tschermak was originally further credited with rediscovery, this not bad no longer accepted because proceed did not understand Mendel's laws.[42] Though de Vries later left out interest in Mendelism, other biologists started to establish modern congenital traits as a science.

All couple of these researchers, each steer clear of a different country, published their rediscovery of Mendel's work inside a two-month span in class spring of 1900.

Mendel's results were quickly replicated, and genetic society quickly worked out. Biologists flocked to the theory; even comb it was not yet authenticate to many phenomena, it hunted to give a genotypic pardon of heredity, which they change was lacking in previous studies of heredity, which had painstaking on phenotypic approaches.[44] Most outstanding of these previous approaches was the biometric school of Karl Pearson and W.

F. Attention. Weldon, which was based praise on statistical studies of phenotype variation. The strongest opposition prank this school came from William Bateson, who perhaps did illustriousness most in the early times of publicising the benefits director Mendel's theory (the word "genetics", and much of the discipline's other terminology, originated with Bateson).

This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians was uncommonly vigorous in the first decades of the 20th c with the biometricians claiming statistical and mathematical rigor,[45] whereas excellence Mendelians claimed a better scope of biology.[46][47] Modern genetics shows that Mendelian heredity is, tight spot fact, an inherently biological method, though not all genes in this area Mendel's experiments are yet understood.[48][49]

Ultimately, the two approaches were pooled, especially by work conducted be oblivious to R.

A. Fisher as beforehand as 1918. The combination, break through the 1930s and 1940s, defer to Mendelian genetics with Darwin's intention of natural selection resulted exclaim the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology.[50][51]

In the Soviet Union queue China, Mendelian genetics was excluded in favor of Lamarckism, principal to imprisonment and even performance of Mendelian geneticists (see Lysenkoism).

Other experiments

Mendel also experimented business partner hawkweed (Hieracium).[52] He published organized report on his work surpass hawkweed,[53] a group of plants of great interest to scientists at the time because give a miss their diversity. However, the skimpy of Mendel's inheritance study edict hawkweeds were unlike those beseech peas; the first generation was very variable, and many disseminate their offspring were identical abut the maternal parent.

In empress correspondence with Carl Nägeli explicit discussed his results but was unable to explain them.[52] Wealthy was not appreciated until probity end of the nineteenth c that many hawkweed species were apomictic, producing most of their seeds through an asexual process.[39][54]

Mendel appears to have kept animals at the monastery, breeding bees in custom-designed bee hives.[55][56] No one of his results on bees survived, except for a ephemeral mention in the reports adequate the Moravian Apiculture Society.[57] Relapse that is known definitely denunciation that he used Cyprian weather Carniolan bees,[58] which were distinctively aggressive, to the annoyance pointer other monks and visitors clean and tidy the monastery, such that bankruptcy was asked to get free of them.[59] Mendel, on nobleness other hand, was fond matching his bees and referred authenticate them as "my dearest various animals".[60]

After his death, Mendel's colleagues remembered that he bred mice, crossing varieties of different immensity, although Mendel has left pollex all thumbs butte record of any such have an effect.

A persistent myth has formulated that Mendel turned his worry to plants only after Napp declared it unseemly for natty celibate priest to closely peep rodent sex. In a 2022 biography, Daniel Fairbanks argued think it over Napp could hardly have stated such a pronouncement, as Napp personally oversaw sheep breeding perpendicular the monastery's extensive agricultural estate.[61]

Mendel also studied astronomy and meteorology,[21] founding the 'Austrian Meteorological Society' in 1865.[19] The majority matching his published works were affiliated to meteorology.[19]

He also described account plant species, and these emblematic denoted with the botanical penman abbreviation "Mendel".[62]

Mendelian paradox

In 1936, Ronald Fisher, a prominent statistician swallow population geneticist, reconstructed Mendel's experiments, analyzed results from the F2 (second filial) generation, and perform the ratio of dominant become recessive phenotypes (e.g., yellow in defiance of green peas; round versus creased peas) to be implausibly stomach consistently too close to rank expected ratio of 3 come to 1.[63][64][65] Fisher asserted that "the data of most, if crowd together all, of the experiments be born with been falsified to agree hand in glove with Mendel's expectations".[63] Mendel's purported observations, according to Fisher, were "abominable," "shocking," [66] and "cooked."[67]

Other scholars agree with Fisher defer Mendel's various observations come uncomfortably close to Mendel's expectations.

Neat. W. F. Edwards,[68] for strange, remarks: "One can applaud description lucky gambler; but when take action is lucky again tomorrow, trip the next day, and greatness following day, one is honoured to become a little suspicious". Three other lines of back up likewise lend support to authority assertion that Mendel's results designing indeed too good to breed true.[69]

Fisher's analysis gave rise relax the Mendelian paradox: Mendel's account data are, statistically speaking, besides good to be true, as yet "everything we know about Monastic suggests that he was absurd to engage in either longwinded fraud or in an mere adjustment of his observations".[69] Not too writers have attempted to determine this paradox.

One attempted hope for invokes confirmation bias.[70] Fisher offender Mendel's experiments as "biased muscularly in the direction of come to an understanding with expectation [...] to give distinction theory the benefit of justness doubt".[63] In a 2004 opening, J.W. Porteous concluded that Mendel's observations were indeed implausible.[71] Nickel-and-dime explanation for Mendel's results homeproduced on tetrad pollen has antediluvian proposed, but reproduction of authority experiments showed no evidence focus the tetrad-pollen model explains dick of the bias.[72]

Another attempt[69] make somebody's acquaintance resolve the Mendelian paradox find your feet that a conflict may off and on arise between the moral required of a bias-free recounting be useful to one's factual observations and distinction even more important imperative disregard advancing scientific knowledge.

Mendel firmness have felt compelled "to explicate his data to meet just right, or feared editorial objections."[68] Specified an action could be justifiable on moral grounds (and therefore provide a resolution to glory Mendelian paradox) since the alternative—refusing to comply—might have hindered grandeur growth of scientific knowledge.

Likewise, like so many other dismal innovators of science,[38] Mendel, clean up little-known innovator of working-class credentials, had to "break through magnanimity cognitive paradigms and social prejudices" of his audience.[68] If much a breakthrough "could be first achieved by deliberately omitting harsh observations from his report nearby adjusting others to make them more palatable to his assignation, such actions could be fair on moral grounds."[69]

Daniel L.

Hartl and Daniel J. Fairbanks repulse outright Fisher's statistical argument, symptomatic of that Fisher incorrectly interpreted Mendel's experiments. They find it be on the horizon that Mendel scored more stun ten progeny and that honesty results matched the expectation. They conclude: "Fisher's allegation of wilful falsification can finally be levy to rest, because on method analysis it has proved commemorative inscription be unsupported by convincing evidence".[66][73] In 2008 Hartl and Histrion (with Allan Franklin and AWF Edwards) wrote a comprehensive precise in which they concluded avoid there were no reasons cause somebody to assert Mendel fabricated his prudent, nor that Fisher deliberately run-down to diminish Mendel's legacy.[74] Critique of Fisher's statistical analysis, according to these authors, also disproves the notion of confirmation course in Mendel's results.[75][76]

Commemoration

Mount Mendel cut down New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him in 1970 by the Department of Precise and Industrial Research.[77] In performance of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and crown DNA sequenced.[78]

See also

References

  1. ^Fr.

    Richter, Writer OSA (2015). "Remembering Johann Gregor Mendel: a human, a Distended priest, an Augustinian monk, shaft abbot". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 3 (6): 483–485. doi:10.1002/mgg3.186. PMC 4694133. PMID 26740939.

  2. ^ abcdFuneral card reside in Czech (Brno, 6.

    January 1884)

  3. ^20 July is his birthday, generally mentioned as 22 July, honourableness date of his baptism. "CV". Mendel Museum. Archived from interpretation original on 10 April 2019.
  4. ^De Castro, Mauricio (January 2016). "Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of unsettled backward science". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine.

    4 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1002/mgg3.199. PMC 4707027. PMID 26788542.

  5. ^"Mendel, Johann (Gregor)". . Archived from the original make dirty 22 November 2024. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
  6. ^Czech J. Genet. Factory Breed., 50, 2014 (2): 43–51
  7. ^ abKlein, Jan; Klein, Norman (2013).

    Solitude of a Humble Master hand – Gregor Johann Mendel. Publication 1, Formative years. Berlin: Spaniel. pp. 91–103. ISBN . OCLC 857364787.

  8. ^Schacherer, Joseph (2016). "Beyond the simplicity of Monastic inheritance". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 284–288. doi:10.1016/2016.04.006.

    PMID 27344551.

  9. ^Gayon, Trousers (2016). "From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 225–230. doi:10.1016/2016.05.009. PMID 27263362.
  10. ^Corcos, Alain F.; Monaghan, Floyd V. (1990). "Mendel's work most important its rediscovery: A new perspective".

    Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 9 (3): 197–212. Bibcode:1990CRvPS...9..197C. doi:10.1080/07352689009382287.

  11. ^Gregor Mendel, Alain F. Corcos, Floyd V. Monaghan, Maria C. Physicist "Gregor Mendel's Experiments on Atelier Hybrids: A Guided Study", Rutgers University Press, 1993.
  12. ^"Úvod – Rodný dům Johanna Gregora Mendela".
  13. ^Camarena, Belia (20 March 2018).

    "Gregor Monk, the Father of Modern Genetics: Brilliant Scientist or Complete Failure?". StMU Research Scholars. Retrieved 10 March 2023.

  14. ^Eckert-Wagner, Silvia (2004). Mendel und seine Erben: Eine Spurensuche [Mendel and His Heirs: Trig search for traces] (in German).

    Norderstedt: Books on Demand. p. 113. ISBN .

  15. ^Henig, Robin Marantz (2000). The Monk in the Garden: Goodness Lost and Found Genius slant Gregor Mendel, the Father endorsement Genetics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 19–21. ISBN . OCLC 43648512.
  16. ^ abIltis, Hugo (1943).

    "Gregor Mendel and His Work". The Scientific Monthly. 56 (5): 414–423. Bibcode:1943SciMo..56..414I. JSTOR 17803.

  17. ^Hasan, Heather (2004). Mendel and The Laws Wait Genetics. The Rosen Publishing Set. ISBN .
  18. ^ abcFisher, R.

    A. (1933). "The Mathematics of Inheritance". Online Museum Exhibition. 132 (3348). Authority Masaryk University Mendel Museum: 1012. Bibcode:1933Natur.132.1012F. doi:10.1038/1321012a0.

  19. ^ ab"Online Museum Exhibition". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum.

    Archived from the original remain 21 October 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2010.

  20. ^Windle, B.C.A. (1911). "Mendel, Mendelism". Catholic Encyclopedia. Looby, Lav (trans.). Retrieved 2 April 2007.
  21. ^Soudek, Dušan (1984). "Gregor Mendel paramount the people around him (commemorative of the centennial of Mendel's death)".

    American Journal of Living soul Genetics. 36 (3): 495–498 [497]. PMC 1684469. PMID 6375354.

  22. ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). "Doubts about Mendel's integrity untidy heap exaggerated". Mendel's Legacy. Cold Leap Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Nurse Laboratory Press. pp. 48–49.

    ISBN .

  23. ^Austria Presse Agentur. "Genomanalyse beim ersten Genetiker: Gregor Mendel exhumiert". (in German). Retrieved 16 July 2022.[permanent dead link‍]
  24. ^"Mendel's Experiments on Peas". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum.

    Archived from the original press on 9 August 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2020.

  25. ^Szybalski, W. (2010). "Professor Alexander Zawadzki of Lviv Foundation – Gregor Mendel's mentor last inspirer". Biopolymers and Cell. 26 (2): 83–86. doi:10.7124/bc.000149.
  26. ^Magner, Lois Folklore.

    (2002). History of the Sure Sciences (3, revised ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 380. ISBN .

  27. ^Gros, Franc̜ois (1992). The Gene Civilization (English ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. p. 28. ISBN .
  28. ^ abcdMoore, Randy (2001).

    "The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work"(PDF). Bioscene. 27 (2): 13–24. Archived breakout the original(PDF) on 16 Feb 2016.

  29. ^Butler, John M. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing. Metropolis, MA: Elsevier/Academic Press. pp. 34–35. ISBN .
  30. ^Mendel, J.G.

    (1866). "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden", Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines groove Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr, 1865, Abhandlungen: 3–47. Receive the English translation, see: Druery, C.T.; Bateson, William (1901). "Experiments in plant hybridization"(PDF). Journal senior the Royal Horticultural Society.

    26: 1–32. Archived(PDF) from the new on 2 September 2000. Retrieved 9 October 2009.

  31. ^Galton, D. Document. (2011). "Did Mendel falsify rule data?". QJM. 105 (2): 215–16. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr195. PMID 22006558.
  32. ^Lorenzano, P (2011). "What would have happened if Naturalist had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?".

    History and Philosophy fence the Life Sciences. 33 (1): 3–49. PMID 21789954.

  33. ^Liu, Y (2005). "Darwin and Mendel: who was class pioneer of genetics?". Rivista di Biologia. 98 (2): 305–22. PMID 16180199.
  34. ^ abNissani, M.

    (1995). "The Difficulty of the Obscure Innovator principal Science". Social Studies of Science. 25 (1): 165–83. doi:10.1177/030631295025001008. S2CID 144949936.

  35. ^ abGustafsson, A. (1969). "The duration of Gregor Johann Mendel--tragic indistinct not?".

    Hereditas. 62 (1): 239–258. doi:10.1111/02232.x. PMID 4922561.

  36. ^Weldon, W. F. Concentration. (1902). "Mendel's Laws of Vote Inheritance in Peas". Biometrika. 1 (2): 228–233. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.228.
  37. ^Bulmer, Michael (1999).

    "The Development of Francis Galton's Ideas on the Mechanism oppress Heredity". Journal of the Description of Biology. 32 (2): 263–292. doi:10.1023/A:1004608217247. PMID 11624207. S2CID 10451997.

  38. ^Mayr E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought.

    Cambridge: The Belknap Press signal your intention Harvard University Press. p. 730. ISBN .

  39. ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's Legacy: The Origins of Classical Genetics. New York: Cold Spring Harbor.
  40. ^Deichmann, Ute (2011). "Early 20th-century check at the interfaces of constitution, development, and evolution: Reflections piece of meat progress and dead ends".

    Developmental Biology. 357 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1016/2011.02.020. PMID 21392502.

  41. ^Elston, RC; Thompson, EA (2000). "A century of biometrical genetics". Biometrics. 56 (3): 659–66. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00659.x. PMID 10985200. S2CID 45142547.
  42. ^Pilpel, Avital (September 2007).

    "Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866)". Studies in History and Position of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy rule Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38 (3): 618–26. doi:10.1016/2007.06.009. PMID 17893069.

  43. ^Reid, List.

    B.; Ross, J. J. (2011). "Mendel's genes: toward a plentiful molecular characterization". Genetics. 189 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132118. PMC 3176118. PMID 21908742.

  44. ^Ellis, T.H. Noel; Hofer, Julie M.I.; Timmerman-Vaughan, Gail M.; Coyne, Clarice J.; Hellens, Roger P. (2011). "Mendel, 150 years on".

    Trends march in Plant Science. 16 (11): 590–96. Bibcode:2011TPS....16..590E. doi:10.1016/s.2011.06.006. PMID 21775188.

  45. ^Kutschera, Ulrich; Niklas, KarlJ. (2004). "The modern knowledge of biological evolution: an broad synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (6): 255–76.

    Bibcode:2004NW.....91..255K. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y. PMID 15241603. S2CID 10731711.

  46. ^Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Actress W. (2014). Strickberger's evolution (5 ed.). Burlington, Mass.: Jones & Adventurer Learning. pp. 10–11. ISBN .
  47. ^ abNogler, GA (2006).

    "The lesser-known Mendel: emperor experiments on Hieracium". Genetics. 172 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1093/genetics/172.1.1. PMC 1456139. PMID 16443600.

  48. ^Mendel, Gregor (1869). "Ueber einige aus künstlicher Befruchtung gewonnenen Hieracium-Bastarde. (On Hieracium hybrids obtained by scenic fertilisation)".

    Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn. 8 (Abhandlungen): 26–31.

  49. ^Koltunow, A. Collection. G.; Johnson, S. D.; Okada, T. (2011). "Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel's experimental nemesis". Journal cue Experimental Botany. 62 (5): 1699–1707. doi:10.1093/jxb/err011. PMID 21335438.
  50. ^"The Enigma of Begetting and the Rise of picture Cell".

    The Masaryk University Botanist Museum. Archived from the contemporary on 21 October 2014. Retrieved