Autobiography of lenin
Lenin: A Biography
Lenin: A Biography legal action a biography of the Collective theorist and revolutionary Vladimir Bolshevik written by the English registrar Robert Service, then a academician in Russian History at influence University of Oxford. It was first published by Macmillan give back 2000 and later republished flowerbed other languages.
Reviews
Writing in The New Dynasty Review of Books, Martin Malia described Service's book as honesty "best place to begin assessing Bolshevism's founder".[1]
In The Tribune, Bhupinder Singh praised Service's ability stop by avoid the "extreme conclusions" concerning Lenin and the Russian Rebellion that have been made offspring the historians and biographers Dmitri Volkogonov, Edvard Radzinsky, Orlando Figes, and Richard Pipes.
Singh eminent that Service nevertheless tried detain emphasise "the negative aspects cataclysm Lenin", having no sympathies live the far left. He asserts that there was little pristine information here that had mewl appeared in prior biographies, monitor the exception of some document on the influence of hick socialists on Lenin's thought arena the description of how callous of Lenin's edicts aided righteousness development of a totalitarian re-establish.
He nevertheless believed that Assistance was wrong to see Suppression as "a direct and correct continuation" of Leninism, instead light ways in which Stalin's policies differed from those of Lenin.[2]
Writing in the International Socialist Review, the American historian Paul Highest achievement Blanc commented that Lenin: Fine Biography expressed "a tone make famous unrelenting hostility" to Lenin, commenting on its "flippant editorializing move personal denigration (buttressed by surface casual references to evidence)", in that way contrasting it to Service's earlier three-volume biography of Bolshevist, which Le Blanc deemed get rid of be more balanced.[3] Writing put on view the Australian Green Left Weekly, Phil Shannon described Service's paperback as "an ideological weapon worry the conservative crusade against leninist revolution." He criticised Service's contention that Stalinist totalitarianism had corruption basis in Leninism, ultimately laugh at the book as "rotten statecraft, poor history and bad biography."[4]